In response to this story, I wanted to discuss the idea of
the patriarchy and the idea of banding together to eliminate it. This story
tells of a world in which menstruation is eliminated, and great strides are
made in equality, a world that sounds like a personal haven to me. While this
sounds perfect in my eyes, a group still exists that aims to free women from
this new form of oppression. The story offers up the interesting position that
while oppression may not exist in certain aspects, some people may still look
for ways to fight it. The Cyclists in this story made a point to fabricate a
reason for a scientific advance that women fought for a form of oppression,
when actual women from a time before the shunt don’t see it this way at all. In
this particular story, the origin of the cyclists is not revealed and as such
we have no way of knowing if it began as an authentic women’s movement or not.
While I find the position of the cyclists to be completely against what I would
believe in that scenario, I feel that as long as an action is seen as wrong or
rebellious in our society, people will continue to do it just to make a point.
In terms of this specific issue, there are already some people who believe
certain things about menstruation that align very closely with the cyclists’
ideas. While I agree that menstruation should be seen as less of an
unmentionable thing, I still genuinely believe that it is a horrible bane to my
existence and would pay large sums of money to never deal with it again, and as
a woman I get to believe that. What I feel this story boils down to in terms of
smashing the patriarchy and going against the norm is that the women’s movement
is primarily about the right to choose, but is also about the right of a woman
to have the ability to make an educated uninfluenced decision. The cyclists
paint a pretty picture but don’t expose the whole truth in order to gain
support, making them the real deceivers in the end.
No comments:
Post a Comment